Teams

BTA (Daytime) Yong

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-09vs RTC (Daytime) RTC4Joy-HuangWon 30
W#1 DoublesFernanda Navarro / Shveta Balaji vs Xiaoying Qiao / Aihua Xia7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAlison Young vs Darci Freeman6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Phillips / Claudia Yong vs Meeta Harchekar / Jing Huang6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesTing Wang / Fernanda Navarro vs Maya Arias - (DQ)* / Alix Day6-7, 4-1
W#1 SinglesJodi Freudenberger vs Sue Chealander6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Phillips / Na Li vs Tamar Blau / Giselle Pavlovec3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesClaudia Yong / Amy Phillips vs Laura Blanchard / Maika D'ambrosi1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAlison Young vs Mindy Ziffren-hall6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTing Wang / Shveta Balaji vs Jessica Barrett / Alix Day6-3, 6-2
2026-02-23vs NWW-BTA-HsuLost 03
L#1 DoublesFernanda Navarro / Jodi Freudenberger vs Lina Hsu / Lindsay Little5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesShveta Balaji vs Jennifer Eng0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTing Wang / Claudia Yong vs Leslie Kwor / Rachelle Steijn0-6, 0-6
2026-02-16vs RTC (Daytime) RTC4Joy-HuangSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJodi Freudenberger / Na Li vs Xiaoying Qiao / Aihua Xia3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTing Wang / Lan Lancia Guo vs Xiaoying Zhou / Meeta Harchekar4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesJodi Freudenberger / Lan Lancia Guo vs Laura Blanchard / Mindy Ziffren-hall3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlison Young vs Maika D'ambrosi6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesClaudia Yong / Amy Phillips vs Jessica Barrett / Giselle Pavlovec6-4, 6-4
2026-02-05vs NWW-BTA-HsuLost 03
L#1 DoublesFernanda Navarro / Lan Lancia Guo vs Lina Hsu / Lindsay Little4-6, 5-6
L#1 SinglesJodi Freudenberger vs Jennifer Eng1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNa Li / Alison Young vs Leslie Kwor / Juliet Friedl0-6, 0-6
2026-01-28vs RTC (Daytime) RTC4Joy-HuangWon 30
W#1 DoublesLan Lancia Guo / Fernanda Navarro vs Xiaoying Zhou / Jing Huang6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAlison Young vs Aihua Xia6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesClaudia Yong / Na Li vs Wei Luo / Sasikala Rajkumar6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Alison Young
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 2.5
2.34
Lan Lancia Guo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.25
Amy Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.18
Jodi Freudenberger
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.14
Shveta Balaji
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.13
Na Li
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.11
Ting Wang
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.11
Fernanda Navarro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.07
Claudia Yong
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Gillian OConnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Phillips + Claudia Yong224 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Freudenberger + Na Li303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alison Young
20W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%11%89%
2.67
Lan Lancia Guo
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Amy Phillips
7W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Jodi Freudenberger
23W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Shveta Balaji
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Na Li
11W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Ting Wang
5W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Fernanda Navarro
6W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Claudia Yong
4W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Gillian OConnell
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.