Teams

LRC-Baird/Hulburt-Mid Court Crisis

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed Multi-week

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Ken Enslow
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
John Curry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results6 ties
2024-08-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Enslow / Connie Worthen vs Mark Bardwil / Susanna Buttorff6-1, 6-1
2024-07-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Curry / Connie Worthen vs Doris Cruz / Kyle Roberts6-4, 6-2
2024-06-29Split 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Hillman / Ken Enslow vs Kellie Manary / Kent Gavin2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Tays / John Curry vs Maria Kelly / Nicholas Kelly6-4, 6-4
2024-06-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesConnie Worthen / Ken Enslow vs Stephanie Chinn / Paul Hutchins7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesTricia Parsons / Ken Enslow vs Maya Pawlitschek / Anthony Jackson6-4, 6-2
2024-06-09Split 11
W#1 DoublesTricia Parsons / Ken Enslow vs Stacie Nemetz / David Nemetz6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Tays / John Curry vs Mike Abrams / Sarah McCarthy6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Ken Enslow
98W–96L career
0%80%20%
3.01
3
John Curry
95W–52L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.