Teams

LAGUNA CREEK CW8.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 8.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-02vs MILLER PK CW8.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Fortner / Kitty Sevilla vs Emma Patterson / Faye Patterson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Chancellor / Myrthel Daquis vs Kirstin Kolpitcke / Jennie Parker7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJillian Barlow / Ronnie Yamanaka vs Jennifer Pagador / Maria Richardson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Lianne Decker
published
4.30
Jane Fortner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Jillian Barlow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Jessica Chancellor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Eva Wilson-Lee
published 4
3.85
Ronnie Yamanaka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Marissa Friedman
published
3.77
Gina Stoebe
published 4
3.75
Myrthel Daquis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Jennifer Fong-Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Marika Fujimoto
published
Kitty Sevilla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Fortner + Lianne Decker7461% games−0.9% vs expected
Marika Fujimoto + Jennifer Fong-Jackson314 matchesnot enough data
Eva Wilson-Lee + Jennifer Fong-Jackson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lianne Decker
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.33
Jane Fortner
16W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
Jillian Barlow
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.92
Jessica Chancellor
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.91
4
Eva Wilson-Lee
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
Ronnie Yamanaka
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
Marissa Friedman
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.77
4
Gina Stoebe
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Myrthel Daquis
3W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
Jennifer Fong-Jackson
14W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Marika Fujimoto
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Kitty Sevilla
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.