Teams

RINCONADA PK 18MX8.0D

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

20 players · average NTRP / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLina Li / Yongfa Fan vs Manasa Gadde / Jonathan Trinh0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Lina Li
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Joy MENG
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Yan Moore
published
3.83
Julia Peng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Haihua Yan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Shelly Shen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Paul Xie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Zuying Gao
published
3.74
Sunny Wang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Xiang Lu
published
3.63
Wei Han
published
3.53
Yu Sun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
GUOXING LI
published
3.46
Harrison Tsang
published
3.41
Wenxin He
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Lejian Dai
published
3.37
Yongfa Fan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ning Li
published
Sandra Wong
published
Sandy Yao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Yao + Haihua Yan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lina Li
11W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
Joy MENG
11W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
Yan Moore
27W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.88
Julia Peng
22W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Haihua Yan
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Shelly Shen
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Paul Xie
15W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
Zuying Gao
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Sunny Wang
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Xiang Lu
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Wei Han
11W–30L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Yu Sun
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
GUOXING LI
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Harrison Tsang
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Wenxin He
13W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Lejian Dai
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Yongfa Fan
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Ning Li
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Wong
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Yao
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.