Teams

GJTC NSNIDER

2023 CTA ADULT 18-39 - WS · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - WS

5 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-20vs GJTC AROSSMANLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesMelissa Reams / Jordan Preuss vs Claire Meil / Rachel Gidley6-7, 1-6
2023-07-13vs GJTC AROSSMANSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesMichelle Eccles / Jordan Preuss vs Ashley Rossman / Lucy Sanders6-0, 6-0
L#1 Female SinglesMegan Riveros vs Rachel Aiken1-6, 1-6
2023-07-06vs GJTC AROSSMANLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesMegan Riveros vs Michelle Pewters6-7, 6-7
2023-06-29vs GJTC AROSSMANWon 21
W#1 Female DoublesMelissa Reams / Megan Riveros vs Ashley Rossman / Claire Meil6-3, 6-2
L#1 Female SinglesJordan Preuss vs Michelle Pewters4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 Female SinglesMichelle Eccles vs Lucy Sanders6-3, 6-0
2023-06-22vs GJTC AROSSMANSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesAubrey Lee / Megan Riveros vs Lindsey Carpendale / Michelle Pewters6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 Female SinglesJordan Preuss vs Claire Meil1-6, 4-6
2023-06-15Split 11
L#1 Female SinglesMichelle Eccles vs Claire Meil4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 Female SinglesMegan Riveros vs Lindsey Carpendale6-4, 6-4
2023-06-08vs GJTC AROSSMANLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesMegan Riveros vs Rachel Aiken2-6, 2-6
2023-06-01Won 10
W#1 Female SinglesJordan Preuss vs Claire Meil6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Megan Riveros
usually #1 Female Singles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Michelle Eccles
usually #1 Female Singles 33%, also #2 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Jordan Preuss
usually #1 Female Singles 60%, also #1 Female Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Melissa Reams
published
Natasha Snider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Preuss + Michelle Eccles5266% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Megan Riveros
49W–31L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Michelle Eccles
35W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
3
Jordan Preuss
52W–39L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
Melissa Reams
18W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
2.76
Natasha Snider
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.