Teams

LHP/Pollitt

2025 Broward Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-18vs Veltri/GoldsteinLost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Tichacek / Kerry Harrison vs Vincent Zarrella / Theodore Brill1-6, 0-6
2025-03-17vs Broward/Barber/40&Over3.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesDomingos Carlos / Ian Turnoff vs Mark Reyes / Mark Sullivan4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSanjeev Sanghera vs Jon Ganio6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRamon Rodriguez / Dana Pollitt vs Edward Gaela / Kenneth Croft0-6, 4-6
2025-03-10vs Midtown/HomesLost 01
L#2 DoublesMike Tichacek / Paul Saxenmeyer vs Matt Zifrony / Tae Park2-6, 0-6
2025-03-03vs HeronBay/BanhamLost 01
L#4 DoublesMike Tichacek / Paul Saxenmeyer vs Fernando Romay / Alexey Gutin4-6, 2-6
2025-02-03Won 10
W#4 DoublesRamon Rodriguez / Mike Tichacek vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-01-13vs Midtown/HomesLost 01
L#4 DoublesMike Tichacek / Charles Bell vs Juan Carlos Alcocer / Luis Fajardo0-6, 0-6
2025-01-06vs HeronBay/BanhamLost 01
L#4 DoublesMike Tichacek / Michael Maucker vs Fernando Romay / Alexey Gutin1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Ian Turnoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Eric Chirinsky
published 3
2.66
David Mishkin
published 3
2.66
Ramon Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Dana Pollitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Roy Mandke
published
2.51
Nico Romano
published
2.50
Sanjeev Sanghera
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.49
Mike Tichacek
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Kerry Harrison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Pollitt + Roy Mandke2335% games−2.3% vs expected
Nico Romano + Sanjeev Sanghera134 matchesnot enough data
Dana Pollitt + David Mishkin033 matchesnot enough data
Roy Mandke + Ramon Rodriguez033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ian Turnoff
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Eric Chirinsky
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
David Mishkin
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Ramon Rodriguez
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Dana Pollitt
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
Roy Mandke
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
Nico Romano
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Sanjeev Sanghera
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Mike Tichacek
298W–203L career · 6 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Kerry Harrison
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.