Teams

Buffalo One 8

2026 55&Over Men · 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-04vs Hutch TechLost 02
L#1 DoublesDarren Stohr / Richard Collins vs Paul Hutschenreuter / Jim Texter2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJames Glennon / Chris Cardillo vs Bill Williams / Sanjeev Relan3-6, 2-6
2026-07-28vs Hutch TechSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGlenn Snowden / James Glennon vs Bill Williams / BISWAJIT ROY4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKamu Pindiprolu / John LeMar vs Gordy Sage / Robert Casell7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-21vs Hutch TechLost 02
L#1 DoublesChris Cardillo / Richard Collins vs Paul Hutschenreuter / Ronald White5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGlenn Snowden / Darren Stohr vs Robert Casell / Carl DiNatale3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-14vs Hutch TechLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Glennon / Chris Cardillo vs Paul Hutschenreuter / Jim Texter4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGlenn Snowden / Darren Stohr vs Timothy Prise / Sanjeev Relan5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKamu Pindiprolu / Richard Collins vs Gordy Sage / BISWAJIT ROY4-6, 6-7
2026-07-07vs Hutch TechLost 02
L#1 DoublesKamu Pindiprolu / John LeMar vs Timothy Prise / Sanjeev Relan0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJames Glennon / Glenn Snowden vs BISWAJIT ROY / Gordy Sage2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Darren Stohr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Glenn Snowden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
James Glennon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.17
Kamu Pindiprolu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Chris Cardillo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
John LeMar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Urban
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Collins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Glennon + Chris Cardillo0523% games−11.2% vs expected
James Glennon + Glenn Snowden134 matchesnot enough data
Kamu Pindiprolu + James Glennon033 matchesnot enough data
Kamu Pindiprolu + Glenn Snowden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darren Stohr
162W–191L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Glenn Snowden
36W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
James Glennon
67W–97L career · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Kamu Pindiprolu
58W–115L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Chris Cardillo
8W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
John LeMar
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michael Urban
57W–65L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Collins
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.