Teams

BHSC

2022 Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over · Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-06vs Hops and DropsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMeredith Mcclellan / Lorenzo Davis vs Cindy Grace / Jeff Heatwole7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-05-15vs Chew Gum & Kick AceWon 20
W#2 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Alexis Ryan vs Sarah Gallagher / Ben Jorgensen7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEdward Lis / Ellen Welch vs Derek Frazier / Mary Voelmle6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-03vs Chew Gum & Kick AceWon 10
W#3 DoublesEdward Lis / Ellen Welch vs Derek Frazier / Tammy Hertel1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-27vs HEDSLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeredith Mcclellan / Lorenzo Davis vs CAROLYN WARD / David Clemens7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Reid Phillips
published
Daniel Carlson
published 4.5
3.87
Lorenzo Davis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Alexis Ryan
published 4
3.62
Meredith Mcclellan
published
3.50
Edward Lis
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.47
Matthew Reidenbach
published
3.44
Steve Lichtenstein
published
Jennie Chiu
published
Joan Carlson
published
Lindsay Phillips
published
Lynette Meynig
published
Peter Welch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reid Phillips + Lindsay Phillips303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reid Phillips
11W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Daniel Carlson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Lorenzo Davis
113W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Alexis Ryan
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Meredith Mcclellan
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Edward Lis
136W–133L career · 5 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Matthew Reidenbach
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
Steve Lichtenstein
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
Jennie Chiu
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joan Carlson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lindsay Phillips
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynette Meynig
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Welch
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.