Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.0A-DT

2023 ADULT 18&Over Daytime · Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Chandra Thomas
published 4.5
4.15
Angelita Vallejo
published 4.5
4.14
Lena Larionova
published
4.03
Martha Matrisian
published
4.03
Ana Larner
published 4
3.96
Cassie Kim
published 4
3.88
Stacey Blackman
published
3.87
Esther Parti
published
Cindy Rountree
published 4
3.73
3.73
Kym Dawid
published
3.73
Megan Patterson
published
3.49
Huijuan Wang
published
3.30
Katherine Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Larner + Cassie Kim3256% games+10.6% vs expected
Megan Patterson + Cassie Kim5164% games+3.0% vs expected
Angelita Vallejo + Chandra Thomas7165% games−1.7% vs expected
Ana Larner + Stacey Blackman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chandra Thomas
27W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Angelita Vallejo
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
4.15
Lena Larionova
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
4.14
Martha Matrisian
22W–13L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Ana Larner
42W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Cassie Kim
31W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.96
Stacey Blackman
25W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Esther Parti
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Cindy Rountree
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Christine Hohenstein
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Kym Dawid
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Megan Patterson
16W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Huijuan Wang
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Katherine Ryan
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.