Teams

RHeroux

2022 Cap Spring USTA 55 & over · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-20Won 20
W#1 DoublesDeb Skiko / Helen Harris vs Brenda Coules / Martha Zurawel7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRegina Heroux / Averil Glover vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-29vs SGreerLost 01
L#2 DoublesDeb Skiko / Helen Harris vs Jean Harrold / Ginger Shields3-6, 6-7
2022-04-22vs JLake55+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDeb Skiko / Debbie O'Rourke vs Joyce Lake / Cynthia Smith6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAveril Glover / Annmarie Curle vs Susan Hembarsky / Donna Wells6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPamela Pitre / Sharon Cole vs Susan Flanagan / Susan Shaw0-6, 2-6
2022-04-15vs SRabbyLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Shelburne / Pamela Pitre vs Lynn Dixon / Stephanie Rabby3-6, 3-6
2022-04-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDeb Skiko / Averil Glover vs Missy van Lokeren / Beth Johnson1-6, 4-6
2022-04-01vs IpmccollumLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebbie O'Rourke / Deb Skiko vs Judith Gallagher / Pamela McCollum4-6, 4-6
2022-03-26vs MHoagLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatherine Shelburne / Nannette Goodwin vs Jane Britt / Suellen Bailey3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnnmarie Curle / Averil Glover vs Rosalind Manning / Lysa Stylski4-6, 4-6
2022-03-11Split 11
W#2 DoublesDeb Skiko / Averil Glover vs Ginger Shields / Sally Spetz6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharon Cole / Pamela Pitre vs Susan Cook / Elizabeth Samuels0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Annmarie Curle
published 4
3.83
Nannette Goodwin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Deb Skiko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.36
Katherine Shelburne
published
3.33
Helen Harris
published 3.5
3.23
Averil Glover
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Sharon Cole
published
2.61
Pamela Pitre
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Laurie Randall
published
Regina Heroux
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annmarie Curle
99W–52L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Nannette Goodwin
313W–205L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Deb Skiko
110W–112L career · 6 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
Katherine Shelburne
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Helen Harris
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Averil Glover
108W–92L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Sharon Cole
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Pamela Pitre
47W–130L career · 7 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Laurie Randall
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Regina Heroux
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.