← Teams

IRV-Kayser/Robertson

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Libby North
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Kristen Kopack
published 4
3.77
May Albano
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published 4
3.76
Lisa Lyon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Carrie Putsch
published 4
3.71
Morgan Towle
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Tara Hendrickson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.69
Andrea Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
Results8 ties
2025-03-14Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLisa Lyon / May Albano vs Lorna Goth / Tina Clancy6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMorgan Towle / Andrea Robertson vs Rebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-28Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesTara Hendrickson / May Albano vs Liz DelPlato / Katherine Kralj6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristen Kopack / Morgan Towle vs Marie Picard / Crystal Bryant6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLibby North / Antoinette Ann Reno vs Kristen Benkstein / Shannon Roarke7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMorgan Towle vs Ren Toshié Miura6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristen Kopack / Tara Hendrickson vs Hong Huynh / Patty Kleckner5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-15Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKristen Kopack / May Albano vs Clarice Brown / Kelly Miller6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMorgan Towle / Andrea Robertson vs Michelle Posey / Alyssa Wong6-3, 6-3
2025-02-02Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesAndrea Robertson / Kristen Kopack vs Julie Brown / Elisa Geller6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMay Albano / Lisa Lyon vs Seungja Shin / Vivian Nguyen7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathleen Goodfriend / Morgan Towle vs Loo Yah Leong / Anita Rockwell2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-01-17Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAshleigh Kayser / May Albano vs Kaie Wellman / Julie Bradford6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMorgan Towle / Kathleen Goodfriend vs Tiffany Bowie / Rachel Novak6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Lyon / Antoinette Ann Reno vs Marie Sellke / Claire Adamsick4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-01-12Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesAndrea Robertson / May Albano vs Karen Ohollaren / Launi Smith4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs Vickie Maletteri7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAshleigh Kayser / Lisa Lyon vs Donna Feuerherdt / Mary Hlady2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMorgan Towle / Kathleen Goodfriend vs Teresa Jackson / Catherine Crosby6-4, 7-6
2025-01-04Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAndrea Robertson / Lisa Lyon vs Karen Dellinger / Flor Harrigan6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTara Hendrickson / Morgan Towle vs Angelina Warriner / Dongju Won7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Libby North
51W–49L career
0%99%1%
3.78
4
Kristen Kopack
70W–45L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
May Albano
62W–52L career
1%99%1%
3.77
4
Lisa Lyon
91W–68L career
0%99%0%
3.76
4
Carrie Putsch
62W–49L career
2%98%0%
3.73
4
Morgan Towle
59W–54L career
2%98%0%
3.71
4
Tara Hendrickson
71W–65L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Andrea Robertson
92W–64L career
2%98%0%
3.69

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.