Teams

Cebulash - Who Is We? Evolution

2025 Loudoun Singles · Loudoun Singles 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-30vs Paragas - HemidemisemiFederersLost 01
L#1 SinglesMike Ly vs Praveen Mullacherry0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesChris Bokel vs Ronnie Greene6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMike Ly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-12vs Hopkins - Serve AcesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesChristopher Bullman vs Eric Hopkins6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMike Ly vs Scott Kahan1-6, 2-6
2025-10-06vs Velasquez - TrailblazersWon 10
W#3 SinglesSanthosh Potti vs James Cheong6-0, 6-0
2025-10-03vs Nguyen - Stringing WinnersWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristopher Bullman vs Sunil Bedakihal6-0, 6-0
2025-09-27vs Hopkins - Serve AcesWon 10
W#2 SinglesSanthosh Potti vs Nabil Ghadiali6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSanthosh Potti vs Ronnie Greene6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesChris Bokel vs Victor Sanchez5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Jesse Cebulash
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #3 Singles 14% · published 4
3.83
Christopher Bullman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Santhosh Potti
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.76
Mike Ly
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.64
3.61
James Reilly
published 3.5
3.56
Taylor Murphy
published
3.54
Chris Bokel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Keming Wu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Ly + Jesse Cebulash13562% games−3.4% vs expected
Christopher Bullman + Jesse Cebulash303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jesse Cebulash
332W–110L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Christopher Bullman
186W–79L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Santhosh Potti
41W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Mike Ly
230W–89L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
SARATHCHANDRA SOMAYAJULA
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
James Reilly
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
Taylor Murphy
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Chris Bokel
83W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
Keming Wu
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.