Teams

Parfitt/LR/CCLR

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-22vs Morshedi/LR/RebsLost 12
L#1 SinglesSam Carter vs Jonathan Halford1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTimothy Byrne vs Greg Engstrom4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesChris Holleman vs Anel Junior Ossius3-6, 1-6
2025-12-11vs Dobry/NLR/BPWon 21
W#1 SinglesTimothy Byrne vs Jim Dobry6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDan Parfitt vs Douglas Yee6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesBrad Howard vs Thomas Dobry1-6, 4-6
2025-12-08vs Morshedi/LR/RebsLost 03
L#1 SinglesColton Smith vs Greg Engstrom2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTimothy Byrne vs Paul Hruby2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesChris Holleman vs Jon Callahan7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2025-12-02vs Lair/LR/LRRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesWilliam Pollock vs Jess Griffin6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJonathan Parkey vs Craig Lair6-1, 7-5
L#3 SinglesDan Parfitt vs Christopher Stewart0-6, 1-6
2025-11-25vs Massey/Burns/LRLost 03
L#1 SinglesJonathan Parkey vs Matt Donaghy1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesColton Smith vs Mark Caruthers3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesBrad Howard vs Don Dobbins2-6, 3-6
2025-11-13vs Dobry/NLR/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesTimothy Byrne vs Thomas Dobry6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesChris Holleman vs Paul Swann7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDan Parfitt vs Jarred Kibbey6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Morshedi/LR/Rebs5113514128
2Massey/Burns/LR3310817135
3Parfitt/LR/CCLR3381022163
4Dobry/NLR/BP0621632199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
William Pollock
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.88
Jonathan Parkey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Brad Howard
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Colton Smith
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.75
Sam Carter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.72
Dan Parfitt
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.68
Chris Holleman
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Timothy Byrne
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sam Carter + Jonathan Parkey7457% games+1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Pollock
22W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Jonathan Parkey
21W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Brad Howard
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Colton Smith
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Carter
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Dan Parfitt
18W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Chris Holleman
15W–16L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Timothy Byrne
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.