Teams

LA - Queen Anne 4.5M

2025 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Men 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-20vs LA LLW Hitmen - Tushar SharmaLost 12
L#1 DoublesFrederik Vig / Philippe Simard vs Eric Fandel / Michael Hsu2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDaniel Gold / Stephen Matuszeski vs Bryson Lee / Shaurya Dhankar3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGavin Lau / Aaron Nepomuceno vs David Graziani / Tushar Sharma1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Stephen Matuszeski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.46
Aaron Nepomuceno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.40
Elan Ruspoli
published
4.37
Daniel Gold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Philippe Simard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Patrick Tan
published
4.24
Ik Jun
published
4.18
Gavin Lau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
Casey Reich
published 4
4.10
Chris Hiromura
published 4.5
4.09
Judah Momon
published
4.09
Alan Siu
published 4.5
3.71
Gene Park
published
Frederik Vig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judah Momon + Stephen Matuszeski224 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Gold + Stephen Matuszeski404 matchesnot enough data
Chris Hiromura + Alan Siu033 matchesnot enough data
Chris Hiromura + Gavin Lau213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stephen Matuszeski
44W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Aaron Nepomuceno
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
4.46
Elan Ruspoli
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Daniel Gold
9W–2L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
Philippe Simard
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%13%
4.34
Patrick Tan
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Ik Jun
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Gavin Lau
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4
Casey Reich
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
4.10
4.5
Chris Hiromura
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
4.10
Judah Momon
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Alan Siu
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.09
Gene Park
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.71
Frederik Vig
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.