Teams

SFV Paseo Tribe

SFV-Adult 18 & Over · SFV - Women 3.5 Weekend

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSeptember Ryken / MISSY LOPEZ vs Susan Warner / Didi Sowul6-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesNatie MacDonald / Monica Kaplan vs Angela Martinez-Lee / Shannon Minor2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarcy Marder / MISSY LOPEZ vs Jill Evans / Lauren Haber6-4, 7-5
2021-05-08vs SFV Team OsaWon 20
W#1 DoublesMonica Kaplan / September Ryken vs Jackie Vo / Yesenia Roa6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMISSY LOPEZ / Marcy Marder vs Raquel Andal / Jing Lin6-1, 7-6
2021-05-01vs SFV Team NFFSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNatie MacDonald / Monica Kaplan vs Wendy Brown / Robin Fishman7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMarcy Marder / September Ryken vs Tami Olshan / Melanie Truhett4-6, 3-6
2021-04-24vs SFV Kiss My AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesSeptember Ryken / Amy Randles vs Azatuhi Chinaryan / Andrea Jayasekera4-6, 3-6
2021-04-18vs SFV Passing ShotsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSeptember Ryken / Monica Kaplan vs Renee Cotter / Debbie Prado6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMISSY LOPEZ / Ivy Bautista vs Miki Lorentz / Janice Miller2-6, 1-6
2021-04-11vs SFV Serve it UpSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSeptember Ryken / Amy Randles vs Michelle Halpern / Deborah Snyder2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMonica Kaplan / Hanan Asfoury vs Alicia Duran / Kristi Kellogg6-0, 6-2
2021-04-03vs SFV Play it ForwardWon 20
W#1 DoublesMonica Kaplan / Natie MacDonald vs Monique Reyes / Cheryl Morrow6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarcy Marder / MISSY LOPEZ vs Tracy Wilson / Linda Merante6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 3.5 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
MISSY LOPEZ
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Rocio Anderson
published
3.13
Monica Kaplan
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.13
Natie MacDonald
published
2.86
Amy Randles
published 3
2.86
September Ryken
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Hanan Asfoury
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Kaplan + September Ryken51040% gamesnot enough data
September Ryken + MISSY LOPEZ2647% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
MISSY LOPEZ
80W–67L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
Rocio Anderson
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Monica Kaplan
43W–94L career · 6 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Natie MacDonald
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Amy Randles
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
2.86
3.5
September Ryken
81W–221L career · 6 lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Hanan Asfoury
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.