Teams

SFV Braemar Babeolats

2022 Adult 18 & Over - SFV · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-02Won 20
W#2 DoublesDebi Conocenti / Catherine Haggett vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTasha Gailys / Sylvia DSouza vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-18vs SFV Shadow's AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesTasha Gailys / Sylvia DSouza vs Carrie Gasper / Diane Quan6-3, 6-3
2022-06-05vs SFV Warner Sugar & SpiceSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJill Evans / Melanie Truhett vs Tammy Scher / Nataliya Padilla6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesCatherine Haggett vs Iris Chen1-6, 0-6
2022-05-22vs SFV Kiss My AceWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngela Bladon / Melanie Truhett vs Teri Gustafson / Christy Weissman6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-15vs SFV Paseo TribeSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCatherine Haggett vs Jacque Clendennen3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Bladon / Melanie Truhett vs September Ryken / Patricia Francisco6-2, 6-1
2022-04-16vs SFV Simply Smashing 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSylvia DSouza / Jill Evans vs Sarah Brownstein / Theresa Sterling1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesTasha Gailys / Sylvia DSouza vs Myrna Castanon / Michelle Wild6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobin Fishman / Melanie Truhett vs Betty Shalom / Michele Sherman3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Kroll / Catherine Haggett vs Kiyomi Fisher / Shabana Shah0-6, 4-6
2022-04-03vs SFV Nikki’s Tennis CrewWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Sato / Catherine Haggett vs Kristen Stills / Adele Slaughter6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Tasha Gailys
published
3.56
Melanie Truhett
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Sylvia DSouza
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Christine Daniel
published 3.5
3.37
Catherine Haggett
usually #1 Doubles 20%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Amy Gandin
published 3.5
3.18
Christine de la Hoz
published 3.5
Julie Sato
published
Robin Fishman
published
Tina Glantz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Truhett + Catherine Haggett3450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tasha Gailys
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Melanie Truhett
125W–106L career · 4 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Sylvia DSouza
110W–97L career · 4 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Christine Daniel
15W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Catherine Haggett
99W–122L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Amy Gandin
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Christine de la Hoz
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Julie Sato
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Fishman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tina Glantz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.