Teams

Miami-Dade/Sosa

2022 Miami-Dade Combo 18 & Over - Day · 8.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-27vs TeamForman (Riviera Prep)Split 11
W#1 DoublesMariana Eberle-Blaylock / Sharon Tompkins vs Helena Maseda / Maira Maguire6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Sosa / Rommy Chang vs Allison Cohen / Monica Pardo5-7, 6-7
2022-08-20vs TeamForman (Riviera Prep)Won 20
W#2 DoublesHelene Buechele / Rommy Chang vs Alba Johnson / Garvine Recalde6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeocadie Ahmes / Cynthia Latham vs Maricarmen Diazmiron / Ellen Malherbe6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-13vs Sioli (Ron Ehmann)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMariana Eberle-Blaylock / Sandra Ubillus vs Alison McLaughlin / Michelle Dalmau6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDaniela Gonzalez / Rommy Chang vs Jennifer Rogers / Jill Hidalgo6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLesley Hernandez / Mabel Vela vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-06vs Haney (Crandon Park)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Ayarra / Daniela Gonzalez vs Catherine McManus / Susie Valls6-3, 6-0
2022-08-04vs Blanchard (Ron Ehmann)Won 10
W#3 DoublesIvanna Omeechevarria / Leocadie Ahmes vs Carin Blanchard / Janine Burke7-6, 6-3
2022-07-09vs Sioli (Ron Ehmann)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDaniela Gonzalez / Rommy Chang vs Marianne Sioli / Alison McLaughlin6-3, 7-5
2022-06-25vs Haney (Crandon Park)Won 20
W#2 DoublesMaria Ayarra / Sharon Tompkins vs Sandra Brand / Hilary Landorf6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesIsabella Ronchi / Alejandra Pinzas vs Barbara Viscito / Elena DeVera6-3, 6-3
2022-06-18vs Blanchard (Ron Ehmann)Won 10
W#2 DoublesIsabella Ronchi / Mabel Vela vs Elizabeth Gonzalez / Angela Jimenez4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Mariana Eberle-Blaylock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cynthia Latham
published 4.5
4.21
Leocadie Ahmes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Sandra Deering
published
4.14
Helene Buechele
published 4.5
4.04
Rommy Chang
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.89
Maria Ayarra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Lesley Hernandez
published
3.88
Isabella Ronchi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Sharon Tompkins
published
3.74
Wendy Sosa
published
3.36
Mabel Vela
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lesley Hernandez + Sandra Deering8160% games+7.0% vs expected
Rommy Chang + Isabella Ronchi5848% games−2.0% vs expected
Rommy Chang + Leocadie Ahmes2344% gamesnot enough data
Rommy Chang + Maria Ayarra314 matchesnot enough data
Leocadie Ahmes + Sandra Deering134 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Deering + Isabella Ronchi224 matchesnot enough data
Mariana Eberle-Blaylock + Isabella Ronchi303 matchesnot enough data
Rommy Chang + Sandra Deering213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mariana Eberle-Blaylock
70W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
4.92
4.5
Cynthia Latham
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Leocadie Ahmes
47W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.21
Sandra Deering
29W–18L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Helene Buechele
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Rommy Chang
119W–78L career · 4 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
4.04
Maria Ayarra
55W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Lesley Hernandez
24W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Isabella Ronchi
94W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
Sharon Tompkins
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
Wendy Sosa
16W–22L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Mabel Vela
26W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.