Teams

Dunwoody CC (Nicole Kitchin)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Fong Huang)

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-11-16vs Chimney Springs (Tina Binette)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesMelissa Lowry / Elizabeth Steelman vs Courtney Cowart / Jennifer Shlesinger6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLesley Weatherly vs Leanne Dennis7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Jane Hess / Leigh Cohen vs Tracey Langford / Liz Robin6-1, 6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJennifer Dees / Nicole Kitchin vs Tina Binette / Courtney Colcord7-5, 2-6, 5-7
W#4 DoublesGreta Griffith / Jennifer Laborde vs Dena Hammond / Christina Tucker6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Fong Huang) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Elizabeth Steelman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Melissa Lowry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Jennifer Laborde
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Lesley Weatherly
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.65
Jennifer Suddes
published
3.55
Nicole Kitchin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Danielle Garrett
published 4
3.50
Elizabeth Ables
published
3.48
Mary Jane Hess
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Susan Kaplan
published
3.39
Leigh Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Greta Griffith
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Hilary Aslaksen
published
3.06
Jody Nathan
published
Jennifer Dees
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melinda McBride
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Jane Hess + Leigh Cohen224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Ables + Mary Jane Hess033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jane Hess + Nicole Kitchin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Steelman
33W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Melissa Lowry
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Jennifer Laborde
24W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Lesley Weatherly
60W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Jennifer Suddes
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Nicole Kitchin
26W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Danielle Garrett
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Elizabeth Ables
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Mary Jane Hess
19W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Susan Kaplan
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Leigh Cohen
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Greta Griffith
13W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Hilary Aslaksen
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.13
Jody Nathan
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.06
Jennifer Dees
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melinda McBride
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.