Teams

Love-ly Ladies

2024 Frederick Adult 40 & Over · Frederick Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-25vs The Lady AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesWhitney Petrie / Stephanie Holguin vs Mugdha Samant / Jillian Zoltek6-2, 7-5
2024-04-18vs The Lady AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesWhitney Petrie / Amy Soderstrum vs Heather Henderson / Natalie Winter6-2, 6-1
2024-04-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesWhitney Petrie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-04vs The Lady AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Soderstrum / Stephanie Holguin vs Natalie Winter / Heather Henderson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-01vs The Lady AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Soderstrum / Theresa Vigder vs Ashley Vancleef / Natalie Winter6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesWhitney Petrie vs Heather Henderson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMercedes Lemp / Karen Libonate vs Melinda Yuhas / Leah Griswold6-7, 6-7
2024-03-25vs The Lady AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Walker / Karen Libonate vs Naresha Moore / Melinda Yuhas6-3, 7-6
2024-03-21vs The Lady AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesVictoria Croyle / Amy Soderstrum vs Kristi Lightse / Natalie Winter6-1, 6-2
2024-03-14vs The Lady AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesErica Murray / Whitney Petrie vs Erica Steadman / Kristi Lightse5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTheresa Vigder / Karen Libonate vs Melinda Yuhas / Marta Maksymiuk6-0, 6-1
2024-03-07vs The Lady AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephanie Holguin / Amy Soderstrum vs Heather Henderson / Natalie Winter6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWhitney Petrie / Mercedes Lemp vs Naresha Moore / Mugdha Samant7-5, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Whitney Petrie
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.85
Amy Soderstrum
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.45
Karen Libonate
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.34
Melissa Walker
published
2.14
Mercedes Lemp
published
Stephanie Holguin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Libonate + Amy Soderstrum4843% games−2.1% vs expected
Whitney Petrie + Amy Soderstrum7167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Whitney Petrie
126W–92L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Amy Soderstrum
98W–70L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
2.85
2.5
Karen Libonate
52W–72L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%64%36%
2.45
Melissa Walker
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.34
Mercedes Lemp
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Stephanie Holguin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.