Teams

BHRC - Jourdan/Lewis

2026 B'ham Spring - Adult 65 & Over Women · 3.0 Women 65 & Over - Wednesday 1:30

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-06vs TRC - Seale/BrunsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesBarbara Cowan / Mary Berryman vs Barbara Snider / Dorothy Hagood2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Lloyd / Elizabeth Henderson vs Betsy Acken / Carol Edwards6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Lewis / Sheila Arnett vs Kathy Seale / Betty Howell6-2, 6-3
2026-04-15vs PRC - WatfordLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheila Arnett / Linda Stewart vs Kelly Bass / Gaile Randall3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Henderson / Karen Lloyd vs Lona Evans / Carol Rutherford6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMary Berryman / Cheryl Davis vs Nikki Christopher / Ella Ruth Stewart6-7, 4-6
2026-04-08vs Hoover C. Club - MooreWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Stewart / Elizabeth Williamson vs Annelle Murphy / Karen Stevens6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Jourdan / Margaret Lewis vs Buffie Whitt / Tracy van Gerwen2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Lloyd / Elizabeth Henderson vs Janie Hart / Gail Moore6-1, 6-3
2026-04-01vs PRC - Chase/SaulWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Stewart / Elizabeth Williamson vs Beatrice Strickland / Ann Swanson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBarbara Cowan / Mary Berryman vs Katherine Willett / Becky Gibson1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMary Jourdan / Karen Lloyd vs Beverley Conner / Rebecca Richardson6-0, 6-4
2026-03-18vs BHRC - Phillips 65+ 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Cowan / Linda Stewart vs Kathryn Phillips / Martie Martindale6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSheila Arnett / Karen Lloyd vs Lee Hoerner / Anne Burke4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Berryman / Cheryl Davis vs Patricia Warren / Angelika Evans6-7, 4-6
2026-03-11vs TRC - PoundersLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheila Arnett / Barbara Cowan vs Terri Russell / Hollie Durbin1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Williamson / Linda Stewart vs Christine Smith / Joanie Waldron1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Lewis / Mary Jourdan vs Janet Muller / Julie Pounders6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 65 & Over - Wednesday 1:30 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Elizabeth Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Sheila Arnett
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Karen Lloyd
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Cheryl Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cynthia Seibert
published 3
2.69
Linda Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
2.69
Margaret Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Mary Jourdan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Mary Berryman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Barbara Cowan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Mary Bagwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Lloyd + Elizabeth Henderson404 matchesnot enough data
Linda Stewart + Sheila Arnett134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jourdan + Margaret Lewis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Henderson
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
Sheila Arnett
8W–16L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Karen Lloyd
6W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Cheryl Davis
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Cynthia Seibert
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Stewart
5W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Margaret Lewis
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Mary Jourdan
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Mary Berryman
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Barbara Cowan
3W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Mary Bagwell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.