Teams

GSTL40/Trask/GrandeDunes

2024 Tri Level 40 & Over · 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-25vs GSTL40/Moran/WachesawWon 30
W#1 DoublesSherri Meyers / Bonnie Trask vs Julie Coggeshall / Genie Matthews6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStaci Bellamy / Sandra Valentine vs Suzanne Baxter / Shayne Matthews6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesShannon Edwards / Erica Guyton vs Nancy Adamson / Jennifer Walsh6-2, 6-1
2024-11-18vs GSTL40/Vaught/PrestwickWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiana Morgan / Deanne Johnson Stephens vs Myla Cabildo / Amy Canavan6-3, 6-4
2024-11-11vs GSTL40/Wilcox/StablesLost 12
W#1 DoublesDeanne Johnson Stephens / Bonnie Trask vs Alison Hayes / Elizabeth Deschamps6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStaci Bellamy / Kim Thomas vs Amanda Davis / Teri Guyer4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Valentine / Erica Guyton vs Tracy Heinemann / Lauren Dieter5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-11-07vs GSTL40/Moran/WachesawLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiana Morgan / Staci Bellamy vs Patricia Horton / Suzanne Baxter3-6, 2-6
2024-10-21vs GSTL40/Wilcox/StablesWon 20
W#1 DoublesBonnie Trask / Sherri Meyers vs Doreen Cribb / Alison Hayes6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErica Guyton / Dayle Oakley vs Jordan Watkins / Alexis Cook6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Sherri Meyers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Dottie Kinlaw
published 4
3.50
Deanne Johnson Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Bonnie Trask
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Sandra Valentine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Diana Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Erica Guyton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Staci Bellamy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Dayle Oakley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Trask + Sherri Meyers5258% games+5.1% vs expected
Deanne Johnson Stephens + Bonnie Trask213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherri Meyers
43W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Dottie Kinlaw
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Deanne Johnson Stephens
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Bonnie Trask
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
Sandra Valentine
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Diana Morgan
53W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Erica Guyton
19W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
Staci Bellamy
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Dayle Oakley
12W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
6%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.