Teams

S-LABogo/CSD 3.0 Sat

2022 Lake 18 & Over Summer Singles · Men 3.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-06Won 20
W#1 SinglesAlex Bogojevich vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesTimothy Vallejos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-30Won 20
W#1 SinglesLouis Foreman vs Dan West6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAlex Bogojevich vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-23vs S-LJFE-Fernandez/PAC 3.0 SatWon 20
W#1 SinglesLouis Foreman vs Ivan Ruyle6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTimothy Vallejos vs Julius Fernandez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-16vs S-LDAndrews/Westport 3.0 SatSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTimothy Vallejos vs David Andrews3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesLouis Foreman vs James Laurenson6-0, 6-1
2022-07-09vs S-LJReiner/ NMP Singles 3.0Won 10
W#3 SinglesAlex Bogojevich vs Gian Sarolli6-2, 6-0
2022-07-02vs S-LJFE-Fernandez/PAC 3.0 SatWon 30
W#1 SinglesLouis Foreman vs Julius Fernandez7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAlex Bogojevich vs Walter Rodriguez6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesTimothy Vallejos vs Pete Richards2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-25Lost 12
L#1 SinglesAlex Bogojevich vs Brett Schmerge4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSteve Hogg vs Justin Wilkes2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesTimothy Vallejos vs Jeff Ahlstedt6-0, 6-0
2022-06-11vs S-LJReiner/ NMP Singles 3.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesLouis Foreman vs Gian Sarolli6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAlex Bogojevich vs Dan West6-2, 6-1
2022-06-04vs S-LJFE-Fernandez/PAC 3.0 SatLost 12
L#1 SinglesTimothy Vallejos vs Ivan Ruyle1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesLouis Foreman vs Ranjith Rajadurai6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesSteve Hogg vs Russell Swift4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Louis Foreman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.31
Robb Stamey
published
3.06
Alex Bogojevich
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Timothy Vallejos
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Steve Hogg
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Vallejos + Steve Hogg7354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Louis Foreman
266W–113L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
Robb Stamey
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Alex Bogojevich
135W–90L career · 6 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Timothy Vallejos
85W–146L career · 6 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Steve Hogg
51W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.