Teams

Giambrone/40/3.0/UC

2025 BR Adult 40 & Over - Men · 3.0 BR (40&O) Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-07vs Schmoll/40/3.0/M/BRECLost 12
L#1 DoublesCleve Brown / Nick Toben vs Steve Caruso / Jacob Smith7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJay Piland / Michael Dupont vs Matthew Tregre / Scott Saporito6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBryon Clegg / Bruce Bordelon vs Jesus Pineda / James Mason6-7, 6-7
2025-03-24vs Burns/40/3.0/M/SOACLost 13
L#1 DoublesBruce Bordelon / Jay Piland vs Kenny Burns / Tyson Duplantis5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJeremy Glascock vs Luke Betts0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Vincent / Michael Dupont vs Matt Hunt / Joey Crifasi6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSteven Giambrone / Cleve Brown vs Josue Carranza / Scott Bardwell2-6, 3-6
2025-03-17vs Antilley/40/3.0/M/BocWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Balhoff / Michael Vincent vs Dow Segrest / Nicholas Hartman6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJudson Banks vs Bradley Meek6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCleve Brown / Jeremy Glascock vs Stephen St Cyr / Stewart Gordon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-10vs Huff/40/3.0/M/CCLASplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrian Balhoff / Michael Vincent vs Benjamin Mouton / Chip Lambert6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSteven Giambrone vs Kip Smith3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCleve Brown / Jay Piland vs Max Huff / Blake Whittle4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBryon Clegg / Nick Toben vs Jeremy Martin / Raphael Crawford4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-24vs Schmoll/40/3.0/M/BRECSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Oliver / Brian Balhoff vs Zach Ingram / Steve Caruso2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNick Toben vs Craig Lindsay1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Giambrone / Cleve Brown vs Jacob Smith / Phillip Barker6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJay Piland / Bryon Clegg vs Mike Guerin / Scott Saporito6-0, 7-6
2025-02-10vs Antilley/40/3.0/M/BocSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Oliver / Michael Vincent vs Scott Gardiner / Billy Ridge7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJudson Banks vs Nicholas Hartman6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSteven Giambrone / Cleve Brown vs David Rollins / Stephen St Cyr6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJay Piland / Bruce Bordelon vs Stewart Gordon / Scott Uffman6-4, 6-3
2025-02-03vs Burns/40/3.0/M/SOACLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Balhoff / Jeremy Glascock vs Ali Momenzadeh / Jay Thomas6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteven Giambrone / Bryon Clegg vs Josue Carranza / Shawn Phan6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJay Piland / Nick Toben vs Barrett Blanchard / Logan Perry6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-27vs Huff/40/3.0/M/CCLALost 04
L#1 DoublesBrian Balhoff / Judson Banks vs Chip Lambert / Todd Smith4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNick Toben vs Steven Grissom0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCleve Brown / Steven Giambrone vs Kip Smith / Max Huff2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJay Piland / Bryon Clegg vs Rob Dille / Blake Whittle5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 BR (40&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Michael Dupont
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Jay Piland
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.96
Cleve Brown
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.85
Michael Vincent
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Bryon Clegg
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Brian Balhoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Bruce Bordelon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Nick Toben
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Jeremy Glascock
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Judson Banks
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Steven Giambrone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Piland + Michael Dupont4165% gamesnot enough data
Steven Giambrone + Cleve Brown224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Dupont
36W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Jay Piland
65W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
3
Cleve Brown
25W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Michael Vincent
20W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Bryon Clegg
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Brian Balhoff
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Bruce Bordelon
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Toben
10W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Jeremy Glascock
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Judson Banks
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Giambrone
4W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.