Teams

DTC SILVER

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs SKY NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesCraig Johnson / Chris Samuelson vs Dan Galemba / Wynne Stuart7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMatt Lawton vs Fabio Massena0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Denler / Tyler Lavin vs Larry Schneider / Mark Jewell6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Chadd / Scott Jahnke vs Marcelo Calle / Michael Thomsic6-1, 6-2
2026-07-06vs CACM REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesJohn Denler / Craig Johnson vs Tom Peters / Dan Avery6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Aschenbrener vs Richard Kang4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesScott Jahnke / John Chadd vs Brad Webb / Jim Gordon3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarcus McCarty / Jim Conley vs Paul Chandler / Carlos Estrada1-6, 1-6
2026-06-29vs CP GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesCraig Johnson / John Denler vs David Friedman / Hal Writer6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMichael Aschenbrener vs Christopher Gilbert7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarcus McCarty / John Chadd vs John Dominguez / John Thompson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChris Curwen / Jim Conley vs Benjamin Wood / Sean McDermott7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-22vs CP GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesChris Samuelson / Craig Johnson vs Mark Raabe / Luke Galli6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichael Aschenbrener vs Brett Truka6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMarcus McCarty / Jim Conley vs Patrick Riley / Zach VanCamp4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesScott Jahnke / John Chadd vs Jeff Boyer / Madhukar Kollengode6-3, 6-0
2026-06-15vs CM REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesChris Samuelson / Craig Johnson vs Paul Kluck / Mark Fulford6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTyler Lavin vs John Roberts6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesScott Jahnke / Marcus McCarty vs Paul Tighe / Matt Teitelbaum7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChris Curwen / Jim Conley vs Jake Allen / Casey Cowan6-2, 6-2
2026-06-08vs CM GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCraig Johnson / Chris Samuelson vs Pete Fredricks / Patrick Kehoe3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMichael Aschenbrener vs Nils Holum7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Denler / Tyler Lavin vs Joe Covell / David Milliken6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMatt Lawton / Scott Jahnke vs Gordon Smith / David Krutsinger7-5, 6-3
2026-06-01vs WP-G NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesCraig Johnson / Chris Samuelson vs Steve Kazemi / Michael Darling6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMichael Aschenbrener vs Jacob White6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Curwen / Tyler Lavin vs Ed Fuentes / Dustin du Pont6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesScott Jahnke / Matt Lawton vs Hunter Clark / Val Bardash3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Tyler Lavin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.02
Craig Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Chris Samuelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Michael Aschenbrener
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.92
Scott Jahnke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Chris Curwen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Jue Cao
published
2.77
John Chadd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
John Denler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Matt Lawton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.64
Marcus McCarty
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Jim Conley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcus McCarty + Matt Lawton5643% games+1.6% vs expected
Craig Johnson + Chris Samuelson4354% games+0.4% vs expected
Craig Johnson + Chris Curwen3349% games−1.5% vs expected
Michael Aschenbrener + Scott Jahnke4450% games−4.1% vs expected
Chris Curwen + John Denler2343% gamesnot enough data
Chris Curwen + Jim Conley224 matchesnot enough data
Jim Conley + John Chadd134 matchesnot enough data
Jim Conley + Marcus McCarty134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Lavin
11W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
3
Craig Johnson
19W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Chris Samuelson
12W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Michael Aschenbrener
16W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Scott Jahnke
12W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
2.92
3
Chris Curwen
54W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Jue Cao
15W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
John Chadd
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
John Denler
51W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Matt Lawton
15W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Marcus McCarty
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Jim Conley
6W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.