Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/ 18AW4.0B

2021 ADULT 18 & Over · Women's 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-07-25vs WALNUT CREEK RC/ 18AW4.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Conversano / Kristin Westergard vs Susan Gabe / Shirley Valero6-3, 6-2
2021-07-18vs WALNUT CREEK RC/ 18AW4.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Conversano / Jessie Thomas vs Lisa McGuinness / Margaret Worden6-4, 6-0
2021-06-29vs OAKHURST CC 18AW4.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Conversano / Melissa Heng Steele vs Jeri Feuer / Cheryl Enos5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Lena Larionova
published
4.06
Martha Matrisian
published
4.05
Donna Himenez
published 4
4.01
Hilary Hartwig
published 4
3.96
Jennie Kessinger
published
3.90
Athena Lofquist
published 4
3.90
Janell Mollenhauer
published
3.81
Jill Van Slyke
published
3.79
3.76
Heidi Belton
published 4
3.75
Laurie Lowery
published
3.71
Sharleen Houston
published
3.66
Priyanka Holmes
published
3.58
Melissa Heng Steele
published
3.52
Ellie Kann
published 4
3.50
Violeta Franco
published
3.30
Mary Conversano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Tammie Snyder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Himenez + Heidi Belton7161% games+2.1% vs expected
Athena Lofquist + Janell Mollenhauer213 matchesnot enough data
Martha Matrisian + Janell Mollenhauer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lena Larionova
15W–8L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
4.16
Martha Matrisian
19W–13L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Donna Himenez
13W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Hilary Hartwig
98W–61L career · no lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
4.01
Jennie Kessinger
5W–11L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.96
4
Athena Lofquist
26W–12L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.90
Janell Mollenhauer
22W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.90
Jill Van Slyke
7W–49L career · no lines in 2021
93%7%<1%
3.81
4
Kristin Westergard
21W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Heidi Belton
27W–11L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
Laurie Lowery
11W–8L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Sharleen Houston
13W–13L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
Priyanka Holmes
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.66
Melissa Heng Steele
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Ellie Kann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.52
Violeta Franco
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Mary Conversano
67W–89L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Tammie Snyder
24W–15L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.