Teams

LA - Downtown Aces 3.5

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Women 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-22vs LA - Slice GirlsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKeum Ko / Hyo Jung Kim vs Rina Matsuoka / Veronika Zherdeva5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKat Kim vs Maria Sviridova2-6, 2-6
2025-06-21vs LA - Victorious SecretWon 10
W#1 DoublesHyo Jung Kim / Keum Ko vs Ali Andre / Kate Jensen6-3, 6-3
2025-06-08vs LA - MountainGateLost 02
L#1 DoublesHyo Jung Kim / Keum Ko vs Jennifer Bevan / Elizabeth Burrows7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKat Kim vs Sheila Volk-Weiss5-7, 1-6
2025-06-01vs LA - Cheviot HillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnnie Shao / Maryann Brandon vs Amanda Humphrey / Amanda Weatherhead6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGordana Raca / Lilly Shuton vs Spencer Schlesinger / Paige Triplett6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-31vs LA LLW LATC - Karen ChouLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnie Shao / Maryann Brandon vs Jennifer Foley / Shauna Cross3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-18vs LA - Canyon Coyotes 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesFariba Navid / Lilly Shuton vs Andrea Hutchman / Annie Carmona6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Yu / Maryann Brandon vs Elizabeth Heitner / Ana Franco6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Hyo Jung Kim
published
3.26
Gordana Raca
published
Annie Shao
published 3.5
3.20
Lisa Yu
published
3.18
Lauri Brenner
published
3.18
Dianne Galindo
published 3.5
3.16
Yoko Kanayama
published
3.13
Claire Gibbs
published 3.5
3.12
Keum Ko
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.11
Tamar Stevens
published
3.05
Mia Babilonia
published
3.04
Lilly Shuton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Maryann Brandon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Kat Kim
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.88
Fariba Navid
published
2.73
Johanna Baumann
published
2.64
2.44
Andrea Crum
published 3
Meredith Levine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keum Ko + Hyo Jung Kim5159% games+10.6% vs expected
Fariba Navid + Yoko Kanayama1436% games−3.1% vs expected
Keum Ko + Kat Kim3249% gamesnot enough data
Maryann Brandon + Lilly Shuton123 matchesnot enough data
Claire Gibbs + Johanna Baumann123 matchesnot enough data
Tamar Stevens + Lisa Yu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hyo Jung Kim
24W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Gordana Raca
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Annie Shao
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Yu
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Lauri Brenner
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Dianne Galindo
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Yoko Kanayama
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Claire Gibbs
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Keum Ko
109W–69L career · 7 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Tamar Stevens
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Mia Babilonia
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.05
3.5
Lilly Shuton
90W–82L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Maryann Brandon
94W–139L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Kat Kim
50W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Fariba Navid
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Johanna Baumann
9W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Christina Buckley
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Andrea Crum
1W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Meredith Levine
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.