Teams

PLEASANTON 40MX7.0B

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesNimesh Gandhi / Ann del Rio vs Candace Gee Koo / Kausik Misra3-6, 2-6
2025-08-03vs STONEBRAE CC 40MX7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristine Start / Nimesh Gandhi vs Jazelle Nono / Vicente Belizario1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNimesh Gandhi / Swina Sapkota vs Jennifer Do / Eric Zhong3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNimesh Gandhi / Christine Start vs Gary Fries / Aihua He5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-22vs MONTE VISTA HS 40MX7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesNimesh Gandhi / Swina Sapkota vs Vamsi Boppudi / Deborah Gaisser7-5, 1-0
2025-06-14vs BAY TREES PK 40MX7.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesNimesh Gandhi / Shirley Valero vs Julieta Leong / Chen Zhang2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Rowan Semilla
published
3.46
Diem Nguyen
published 3.5
3.36
Nimesh Gandhi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Jonathan Indick
published
3.26
Christine Start
published 3
3.23
Tom Betts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Hazel Indick
published 3.5
3.19
Swina Sapkota
published
3.17
David Hood
published 3.5
3.12
Rosalynd Zahiri
published 3.5
3.07
Lou Salvador
published
2.94
Elise D Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.81
Nellie Hill
published
2.57
Ruby Jane Kangleon
published
Jason Ehrlich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shirley Valero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hazel Indick + Jonathan Indick4153% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rowan Semilla
11W–25L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Diem Nguyen
25W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Nimesh Gandhi
147W–82L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36
Jonathan Indick
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3
Christine Start
23W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.26
Tom Betts
12W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Hazel Indick
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Swina Sapkota
20W–17L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
David Hood
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Rosalynd Zahiri
94W–58L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.12
Lou Salvador
27W–22L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.07
3
Elise D Harvey
71W–78L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Nellie Hill
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
Ruby Jane Kangleon
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.57
Jason Ehrlich
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shirley Valero
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.