Teams

Trust the Process

Adult Tri-Level League · Tri Level Men 3.5-4.5 Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / PHILADELPHIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · Tri Level Men 3.5-4.5 Saturday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1United 4.5 Tri000000
2Great Valley 12.0000000
3Aces 12.0 Tri000000
4We Canh Do It 4.5000000
5Naylor's Run000000
6Upper Dublin Wolfhounds000000
7Trust the Process000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
David Stimmler
published 4.5
4.12
4.08
Mark Farnsworth
published
4.00
Thomas Anapol
published
3.94
Daniel Taboada
published 4.5
3.83
Neal Rutman
published
3.82
Yevgen Knyazkov
published
3.81
Greg Bosch
published 4.5
Neeraj Dubey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Sterman + Daniel Taboada13459% games−2.2% vs expected
Greg Bosch + Daniel Taboada134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Stimmler
20W–9L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
4.13
4
Christopher Sterman
89W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
4.12
Mark Farnsworth
21W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.08
Thomas Anapol
36W–15L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.00
4.5
Daniel Taboada
112W–49L career · no lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.94
Neal Rutman
76W–32L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Yevgen Knyazkov
147W–68L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4.5
Greg Bosch
23W–40L career · no lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.81
Neeraj Dubey
13W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.