Teams

Huntington, Meg

2024 Team Singles-JXN · Women 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-22vs Castle, MandyWon 20
W#1 SinglesStephanie Sing vs Elizabeth Archer7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMeg Huntington vs Kasey McKay6-3, 6-3
2024-12-15vs Collins, MindyWon 21
W#1 SinglesMacKenzie Carmody vs Eva Hunter6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAnna Miskelly vs Kim Pitts6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesMary Kate Diltz vs Melanie Shapin2-6, 1-6
2024-11-24vs Castle, MandyWon 21
W#1 SinglesMacKenzie Carmody vs Elizabeth Archer6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAnna Miskelly vs Mandy Castle6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesStephanie Sing vs Kim Sims1-6, 4-6
2024-11-17vs Collins, MindySplit 11
L#1 SinglesAubrey Davis vs Eva Hunter4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMary Kate Diltz vs Mindy Collins6-1, 7-5
2024-11-03vs Stubbs, LizWon 20
W#1 SinglesMacKenzie Carmody vs Stacey Coulter6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAnna Miskelly vs Gabrielle Sioufi6-0, 6-2
2024-10-27vs Castle, MandyWon 21
W#1 SinglesMacKenzie Carmody vs Mandy Castle6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesStephanie Sing vs Kim Sims6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMary Kate Diltz vs Elizabeth Archer6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
MacKenzie Carmody
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.73
Anna Miskelly
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4
3.27
Mary Kate Diltz
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.24
Aubrey Davis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Stephanie Sing
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Meg Huntington
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MacKenzie Carmody + Anna Miskelly16160% games+13.1% vs expected
Mary Kate Diltz + Aubrey Davis5083% games+7.8% vs expected
Meg Huntington + MacKenzie Carmody213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MacKenzie Carmody
75W–23L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Anna Miskelly
53W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Mary Kate Diltz
56W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Aubrey Davis
32W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Stephanie Sing
59W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Meg Huntington
36W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.