Teams

Lucky strings / Kroc

2024 Fall 39 & Over-Women-UPTA · 4.0 Women FF

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-11vs HWY14/BlinstonLost 12
W#1 DoublesTamarah Hagen / Christina Engel vs Tressa Jordan / Hope Moriarty6-3, 6-6
L#2 DoublesTrionne Barnett / Cathy Mays vs Leslie Waltz / Jacque Foster4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesYelena Crosston / Bianca Walker vs Rebecca Maddox / Jamie Miller3-6, 0-6
2024-10-21vs Forbes CardinalWon 20
W#1 DoublesKim Tyler / Trionne Barnett vs Cynthia Forbes / Katherine Robinson6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTamarah Hagen / Holly Smith vs Nancy Lanois / Christine Cole4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-07vs HWY14/BlinstonLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaurie Messenger / Kim Tyler vs Rebecca Maddox / Kathryn Rountree3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHolly Smith / Jane Garner vs Camille Adams / Hope Moriarty1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesChristina Engel / Jennifer Shivers vs Christina Rogers / Brooke Reed4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jennifer Shivers
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Joy McWhorter
published
3.76
Christina Engel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4
Bianca Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Tamarah Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Shelley Bauer
published
3.56
Cathy Mays
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Laurie Messenger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Gretchen Wise
published 4
3.33
Yelena Crosston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Garner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Trionne Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gretchen Wise + Laurie Messenger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Shivers
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
Joy McWhorter
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christina Engel
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Bianca Walker
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Tamarah Hagen
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
Shelley Bauer
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Cathy Mays
8W–31L career · 1 line in 2024
32%67%<1%
3.56
Laurie Messenger
15W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Gretchen Wise
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
3.39
Yelena Crosston
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
Jane Garner
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Trionne Barnett
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.