Teams

BC-ElSegundo/JarrodQuan

2023 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Men - 5.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-17vs BC-WestEnd/CarlosCruz-AedoWon 10
W#1 DoublesHunter Kettering / Nicholas de Goede vs Hannes Schenk / Pablo Barajas6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-10vs BC-ElSeguno/AshtonPolitnoffLost 01
L#2 DoublesHenry Mak / Nicholas de Goede vs Eric Basica / Zack Fleishman2-6, 2-6
2023-06-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesNicholas de Goede / Troy Brinker vs Kevin Griffin / Ryan Adam Stanbury6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Henry Mak
published
4.74
Geoffrey Chizever
published
4.61
Troy Brinker
published
4.57
Javeed Kassam
published
4.52
Hunter Kettering
published
4.16
Nicholas de Goede
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Evan Jurgensen
published
Jarrod Quan
published
Joseph Lok
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Henry Mak
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.79
Geoffrey Chizever
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.74
Troy Brinker
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.61
Javeed Kassam
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.57
Hunter Kettering
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.52
4.5
Nicholas de Goede
81W–47L career · 6 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
Evan Jurgensen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jarrod Quan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Lok
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.