Teams

CORTA/Wanda Morpeth

2025 CORTA Southern Combo 55 & Over - Summer · Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CORTA/Yun Ha000000
2CORTA/Jamie Smith000000
3CORTA/Wanda Morpeth000000
4CORTA/Cheryl Williams-Allen000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Pam Knight
published
3.39
Kerri Medders
published
3.33
Wanda Morpeth
published
3.29
Becky Overby
published 3.5
3.04
Amanda Hawkins
published 3.5
2.89
Barbara Harrell
published 3
2.80
Shirley Cargill
published
2.64
Leigh Kosobucki
published
2.62
Aminta Flowers
published 3
2.59
Deirdre Howard
published 3
Patti Brooks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Hawkins + Shirley Cargill12458% games+5.2% vs expected
Becky Overby + Pam Knight7360% games+3.9% vs expected
Leigh Kosobucki + Deirdre Howard3840% games−6.1% vs expected
Pam Knight + Kerri Medders224 matchesnot enough data
Becky Overby + Patti Brooks303 matchesnot enough data
Becky Overby + Kerri Medders123 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Harrell + Shirley Cargill303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Knight
54W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Kerri Medders
55W–56L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Wanda Morpeth
30W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Becky Overby
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Amanda Hawkins
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Barbara Harrell
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.89
Shirley Cargill
24W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Leigh Kosobucki
27W–32L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.64
3
Aminta Flowers
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Deirdre Howard
14W–23L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.59
Patti Brooks
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.