Teams

ETC-Allen

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesTammi Tompkins / Dan Bergstein vs Minori Yoshioka / Mark Hoeke6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMargaret Landry-Navarro / Eugene Besel vs Drew Baldwin / Garima Tandon4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTina Allen / John Charlebois vs Suzanne Vannatter / Charlie Vannatter3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-02vs HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-HuffLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristy Chang / Dan Bergstein vs Christine Boyle / Joseph Carter6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Landry-Navarro / Lucio Tiberi vs Shelley Hagstrom / William Kennelly3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTina Allen / Eugene Besel vs Aaron Young / Missi Huff2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesUtsav Prabhu / Tammi Tompkins vs Lori Punke / Timothy Punke3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargaret Landry-Navarro / Randy Navarro vs Catherine Nielsen / Ian Sweet7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTina Allen / John Charlebois vs Suzanne Vannatter / Charlie Vannatter5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-19vs TCSP-Netsetters-SommerfeldLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristy Chang / Dan Bergstein vs Christopher Landman / Ann Wilson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTammi Tompkins / Randy Navarro vs Julia Sommerfeld / Erik Fraker2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTina Allen / John Charlebois vs Tina Mccorkindale / Mike Kelley2-6, 1-6
2026-07-03vs BC-Happy Love All-ParkLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristy Chang / Dan Bergstein vs jillian leingang / Thane Liffick6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammi Tompkins / Lucio Tiberi vs Erin Park / Ryan Sung1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Rodriguez / Eugene Besel vs Tracy Green / Eric Fredricksen4-6, 2-6
2026-06-28vs CAC/SL-Mixed Nuts-40-ColeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesTammi Tompkins / Dan Bergstein vs arvind Mallikarjunan / Anne Coley2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChristy Chang / Utsav Prabhu vs Mark Seko / Lisa Okimoto6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMargaret Landry-Navarro / Randy Navarro vs Soma Burela / Annie Kuang3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-27vs CP-Party Mixers-EdmondsWon 21
W#1 DoublesTammi Tompkins / Lucio Tiberi vs Rose Smith / Robert Shen6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTammy Besel / Eugene Besel vs Juiling Edmonds / Clellie Dobbs2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTina Allen / Dan Bergstein vs Roo Mulligan / Nikolai Mulligan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-12vs TCSP-Netsetters-SommerfeldLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristy Chang / Lucio Tiberi vs Bruce James / Lois James6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Rodriguez / Utsav Prabhu vs Alice Bankson / Chester Weir4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTina Allen / John Charlebois vs Tina Mccorkindale / John Mannetti1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Christy Chang
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.86
Tammi Tompkins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Dan Bergstein
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.72
Nancy Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Utsav Prabhu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Randy Navarro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Tina Allen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Margaret Landry-Navarro
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Lucio Tiberi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
Kyle Peterson
published
2.33
Eugene Besel
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.31
Tammy Besel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.13
John Charlebois
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Landry-Navarro + Randy Navarro0943% games−2.9% vs expected
Tammy Besel + Eugene Besel41237% games−10.3% vs expected
Nancy Rodriguez + Eugene Besel044 matchesnot enough data
Tina Allen + John Charlebois224 matchesnot enough data
Christy Chang + Utsav Prabhu303 matchesnot enough data
Christy Chang + Dan Bergstein123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christy Chang
60W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Tammi Tompkins
69W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Dan Bergstein
3W–3L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Nancy Rodriguez
52W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Utsav Prabhu
24W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Randy Navarro
0W–10L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Tina Allen
40W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Margaret Landry-Navarro
86W–95L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Lucio Tiberi
17W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Kyle Peterson
18W–16L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Eugene Besel
13W–39L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Tammy Besel
59W–75L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
John Charlebois
3W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.