Teams

HCC - S. Deck

2024 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-07vs Hills/Flinter/40&Over4.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeena Walter / Michele Vogeley vs Kim Fernald / Lynn O'Brien6-7, 2-6
2024-05-31vs HCC Pheonix - J. Van DiverWon 10
W#1 SinglesMichele Vogeley vs Donna Bocko6-2, 6-0
2024-05-29vs Palma Ceia - T. RobertsWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeena Walter / Michele Vogeley vs Christina Laxer / Janel Hutchinson7-6, 6-3
2024-05-24vs HCC - J. PriceWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaurie Smith / Jenny Hughes vs Kristen Wehrman / Matura Suksai6-4, 7-6
2024-05-03vs Davis Island 4.0 - J. MaxwellLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Smith / Jenny Hughes vs Amy Brooks / Joan Gonzalez6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesLaurie Smith / Jenny Hughes vs Jana Bridge / Carolyn Murnane4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDeena Walter / Michele Vogeley vs Melissa O'Connor / Kathryn Thomas6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Patty Halstead
published
3.92
Becky Ogburn
published 4
3.75
Michele Vogeley
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.74
Jenny Hughes
published
3.73
Melissa Sheridan
published
3.72
Deena Walter
published 4
3.71
Shannon Deck
published
3.66
Joann Suyao
published
3.65
Anne Flynn
published 4
3.62
Laurie Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Stephanie Wilson
published
Xiao Zhang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Vogeley + Deena Walter6059% games+5.9% vs expected
Melissa Sheridan + Patty Halstead8263% games+4.9% vs expected
Jenny Hughes + Melissa Sheridan7160% games+4.1% vs expected
Jenny Hughes + Laurie Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Becky Ogburn + Stephanie Wilson303 matchesnot enough data
Anne Flynn + Deena Walter213 matchesnot enough data
Deena Walter + Patty Halstead123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patty Halstead
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Becky Ogburn
24W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.92
Michele Vogeley
69W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Jenny Hughes
22W–18L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Melissa Sheridan
27W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Deena Walter
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Shannon Deck
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Joann Suyao
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Anne Flynn
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Laurie Smith
232W–110L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Stephanie Wilson
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.19
Xiao Zhang
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.