Teams

Hempfield - Clark

2026 Central Penn Tri-Level League · Womens Low Tri Level League (3.0-3.5-4.0)

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Womens Low Tri Level League (3.0-3.5-4.0) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
KELLEY HERSHEY
published 4
3.54
Teresa Clark
published
3.54
Tina Loose
published 4
3.42
Beth Alderman
published 3.5
3.37
Trisha Pearson
published
3.34
Carolyn Hoch
published 3.5
3.15
Kristin Schlageter
published 3.5
3.06
Lore Rigano
published 3
2.94
Deborah Jeffrey
published 3
2.80
Laura Harkin
published
2.72
Claudia Pace
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Loose + Trisha Pearson24361% games+5.9% vs expected
Carolyn Hoch + Kristin Schlageter6649% games+0.2% vs expected
Teresa Clark + Kristin Schlageter2644% games−0.7% vs expected
Teresa Clark + KELLEY HERSHEY4345% games−1.0% vs expected
Lore Rigano + Beth Alderman5259% games−6.5% vs expected
Lore Rigano + Kristin Schlageter2544% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Schlageter + Deborah Jeffrey303 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Schlageter + Trisha Pearson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
KELLEY HERSHEY
131W–83L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Teresa Clark
124W–149L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Tina Loose
207W–125L career · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Beth Alderman
120W–44L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Trisha Pearson
270W–98L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Carolyn Hoch
27W–22L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Kristin Schlageter
203W–251L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.15
3
Lore Rigano
94W–84L career · no lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Deborah Jeffrey
66W–28L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Laura Harkin
21W–37L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Claudia Pace
66W–92L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.