Teams

Lobster Rolls

2022 NOVA Singles Fall Women · NOVA Singles 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-29Won 10
W#2 SinglesAndrea Gevas vs Liz Tran6-1, 6-0
2022-10-21vs Sweet ShotsWon 10
W#2 SinglesAndrea Gevas vs Tara Jefferson6-1, 6-1
2022-10-07vs String CourtettesWon 10
W#3 SinglesAndrea Gevas vs Stephanie Glashow6-3, 5-2
2022-09-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesAndrea Gevas vs Alexis Kramer6-4, 4-3
2022-09-16Won 10
W#2 SinglesAndrea Gevas vs Tracy Phillips6-3, 5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Andrea Gevas
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.86
Cameron Craig
published 4
3.80
Laura Naramore
published
3.75
Nancy Henry
published
3.30
Mary Berkowitz
published
3.29
Susan Velasco
published
3.07
Karla Zedan
published
Laurie Bennett
published
Millette Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Velasco + Millette Miller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Gevas
242W–96L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
4.07
4
Cameron Craig
44W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
Laura Naramore
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Nancy Henry
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
Mary Berkowitz
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
Susan Velasco
51W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Karla Zedan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Ayce Bukulmeyen Ozerdem
18W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
Laurie Bennett
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.