Teams

League of Our Own III

2021 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-23vs RubinoLost 01
L#1 SinglesMia Piansay vs Shalita Williams3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-17vs Honey BadgersLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Besse / Betty Lee vs Kimberly Mielcarek / Dana MacHer7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2021-06-12vs CarsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBetty Lee / Carol Besse vs Miriam Ostria / Carolina Posada7-5, 6-5
L#1 SinglesMia Piansay vs Amy Hafey5-7, 1-6
2021-06-04vs Acing GracefullyWon 10
W#3 DoublesMia Piansay / Mesanie Lee vs Micki Khademi / Lisa Kokoszka7-6, 6-2
2021-05-23vs Battle ReadyLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeidi Sung / Carol Besse vs Michele Brammer / Jessica Lee5-7, 4-3
L#2 SinglesMia Piansay vs Wendy Heger0-6, 1-6
2021-05-19vs Acing GracefullyLost 01
L#1 SinglesMia Piansay vs Riette van Laack1-6, 2-6
2021-05-18vs Honey BadgersLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Besse / Judy Pretka vs Kimberly Mielcarek / Dana MacHer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-06Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMia Piansay vs Amy Hafey1-6, 1-6
2021-04-21vs RubinoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeidi Sung / Carol Besse vs Heather Sine / Shalita Williams6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMia Piansay vs Jessica Somers7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-17vs Battle ReadyLost 01
L#3 DoublesBetty Lee / Mia Piansay vs Mary Papadopulos / Wendy Carey3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Carol Besse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.59
Maria Vassileva
published
3.55
Laura McInerney
published
3.42
3.30
Julia Latein-Kimmig
published
3.27
Mesanie Lee
published
Donna Fitzgerald
published 3.5
3.21
Mia Piansay
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Angela Lee
published 3.5
Karen Robertson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carol Besse
288W–186L career · 5 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
4.06
Maria Vassileva
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
Laura McInerney
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.55
Rani Jeeva Nguyen-Khoa
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
3.42
Julia Latein-Kimmig
14W–19L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Mesanie Lee
26W–27L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Donna Fitzgerald
11W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Mia Piansay
244W–303L career · 8 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Angela Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
Karen Robertson
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.