← Teams

MPRC-Lattz

2019 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
James Stenger
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.06
Gerald Chase
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Douglas Metzker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results7 ties
2019-05-09Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesJim Lattz / Gerald Chase vs William Reykalin / Bob Howard6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRuss Freier / Douglas Metzker vs Jeffrey Bayless / Monty Buchanan6-0, 6-3
2019-04-29Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesGerald Chase / James Stenger vs Gary McKenzie / Tom Knapp7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRuss Freier / Douglas Metzker vs John McLain / John Berkey6-2, 6-2
2019-04-18Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJames Stenger / Gerald Chase vs Craig Frasier / John Hummel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRuss Freier / Douglas Metzker vs Paul Koenigsberg / Rajeewa Arya7-6, 7-5
2019-04-12Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesGerald Chase / James Stenger vs Robert Leitheiser / Jon Mandeville6-2, 6-3
2019-04-05Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesGerald Chase / James Stenger vs Arvid Anderson / Hugh Findlay6-3, 6-3
2019-04-01Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJim Lattz / James Stenger vs Les Wellman / Dan Wendling6-4, 6-0
2019-03-28Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesBill Hurst / Douglas Metzker vs Terry Jackson / David Williams6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
James Stenger
16W–14L career
12%87%2%
3.18
3.5
Gerald Chase
52W–41L career
28%72%0%
3.06
3
Douglas Metzker
8W–25L career · type M
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.