Teams

GOLDMAN TC 40AW4.0B

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Ann Zabat
published 4
3.85
Trina Glidden
published
3.81
Lisa Sennott
published
3.77
Hanh Luong
published
3.73
Maggie Ho
published
3.70
Carrie Portis
published 4
3.65
Lisa Faber
published
3.64
Sirisha Nandipati
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.64
Jennifer Shipp
published
3.54
Nancy Wu
published
3.49
Brooke Kerpelman
published 3.5
3.49
Penny Anderson
published
3.44
Joni Fuse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Lyn Hunter
published
3.38
Grace Chan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Michelle Philpot
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.18
Shan Bai
published
Linda M Scaparotti
published
Margaret Stevenson
published
Suzanne Nick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Shipp + Lisa Sennott7060% games+5.3% vs expected
Maggie Ho + Joni Fuse314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Zabat
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
Trina Glidden
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Lisa Sennott
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Hanh Luong
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Maggie Ho
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Carrie Portis
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Lisa Faber
21W–19L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Sirisha Nandipati
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Jennifer Shipp
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Nancy Wu
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Brooke Kerpelman
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Penny Anderson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Joni Fuse
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Lyn Hunter
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
Grace Chan
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Michelle Philpot
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Shan Bai
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Linda M Scaparotti
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Stevenson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Nick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.