Teams

Ri.Pfeiffer40M

2023 Cap 40 & Over Mixed · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-16vs Am.Odum40MWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Boyden / Susan Fanelly vs Allan Badulis / Jocelyn Badulis3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-09vs Is.Pataki40MWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Fanelly / Scott Boyden vs Stacy Rank / Istvan Pataki6-2, 6-2
2023-06-25vs Ja.Britt40MWon 20
W#1 DoublesScott Boyden / Dana Weiland vs Tanya Parise / Jason Fu6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRick Pfeiffer / Andrea Pfeiffer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-18vs Er.McAllister40MWon 20
W#2 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Dana Weiland vs Jeff Plemmons / Erin McAllister6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRay Goldberg / Kathleen Tsibulsky vs Leah Weinberger / Duane Bryant4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-11vs Je.Bricker40MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Susan Fanelly vs Adam Thompson / Alexis Johnson6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMark Combs / Andrea Pfeiffer vs Jason Liner / Melissa Liner0-6, 3-6
2023-06-04vs Al.Oliver40MWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Dana Weiland vs John Parsons / Sandy Wood6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Combs / Kathleen Tsibulsky vs Mark Wood / Kristen Howering7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2023-05-28vs Be.Koren40MLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn VanDeWater / Dana Weiland vs Joe Ruggieri / Ginny Meier1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKathleen Tsibulsky / Steven Miller vs Benjamin Koren / Jackie Caprio4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Dana Weiland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Susan Fanelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Mark Combs
published
3.69
John VanDeWater
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Ray Goldberg
published
3.49
Sarah Strickland
published
3.35
Stephanie Rabby
published
3.15
Kathleen Tsibulsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Andrea Pfeiffer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John VanDeWater + Dana Weiland81051% games−7.9% vs expected
John VanDeWater + Andrea Pfeiffer3549% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Weiland
171W–127L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Susan Fanelly
265W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
Mark Combs
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
John VanDeWater
149W–114L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.69
Ray Goldberg
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
Sarah Strickland
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Stephanie Rabby
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Kathleen Tsibulsky
53W–118L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Andrea Pfeiffer
73W–146L career · 2 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.