Teams

NWW-Hummel

2025 One Doubles · 5.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-30vs Beauty and the BaoLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Hummel / Megan Bassetti vs Melisa Biscayno / Mia Nguyen1-6, 2-6
2025-06-29vs Tiny & UnhingedWon 10
W#1 DoublesKari Aggerholm / Lauren Hummel vs Denise Zwald / Lora Edens6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-06-27vs CP-SHBLBBBLGWon 10
W#1 DoublesJodie Wise / Kari Aggerholm vs Elizabeth Gorey / Beth Lehman-Brooks6-0, 6-2
2025-06-24vs WhelanLost 01
L#1 DoublesElla Anderson / Megan Bassetti vs Christine Hayes / Kristi Tremble2-6, 3-6
2025-06-19vs NelsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesElla Anderson / Kari Aggerholm vs Cindy Nelson / Sarah Schodde6-1, 7-5
2025-06-11vs StewartLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Hummel / Ella Anderson vs Amy Walgenbach Udelson / Kathryn Osborne6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 5.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Whelan4242447
2NWW-Hummel3333750
3Beauty and the Bao2323748
4Tiny & Unhinged1313645
5CP-SHBLBBBLG1414854

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.62 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ella Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.73
Jodie Wise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.62
Lauren Hummel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.59
Megan Bassetti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.55
Kari Aggerholm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodie Wise + Kari Aggerholm162049% games+0.5% vs expected
Lauren Hummel + Kari Aggerholm5447% games−7.3% vs expected
Jodie Wise + Megan Bassetti303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ella Anderson
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Jodie Wise
35W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
4.73
5
Lauren Hummel
19W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.62
5
Megan Bassetti
39W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.59
5
Kari Aggerholm
55W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
4.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.