Teams

Vandenberg/LR/Reb

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-16vs ATA TeamSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCory Smith vs Ryan Bates0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJefferson Mcrae vs Peyton Williams4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-01-06vs ATA TeamLost 12
L#1 SinglesEvan Zhang vs Andrew Stone1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesLuis Gallegos vs Nathan Lazarus7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesCory Smith vs Ryan Bates1-6, 2-6
2025-12-10vs ATA TeamLost 12
L#1 SinglesMatt Vandenberg vs Adain Luckadue0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJacob Wagner vs Peyton Williams3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJefferson Mcrae vs Nathan Lazarus6-1, 6-2
2025-12-08vs ATA TeamWon 21
W#1 SinglesCory Smith vs Andrew Stone6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNelson Ha vs Scott Mcclelland6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLuis Gallegos vs Jay Barth4-6, 1-6
2025-11-25vs ATA TeamLost 02
L#1 SinglesJacob Wagner vs Ryan Bates1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesEvan Zhang vs Andrew Stone1-6, 0-6
2025-11-12vs ATA TeamWon 21
W#1 SinglesCory Smith vs Scott Mcclelland6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJefferson Mcrae vs Adain Luckadue0-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesNelson Ha vs Peyton Williams6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.29
Nelson Ha
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.21
Jefferson Mcrae
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.16
Cory Smith
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 2.5
1.98
Jacob Wagner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
1.81
Matt Vandenberg
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
1.80
Evan Zhang
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Jason Nguyen
published
Luis Gallegos
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nelson Ha
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Jefferson Mcrae
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Cory Smith
9W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.16
2.5
Jacob Wagner
3W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Matt Vandenberg
2W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.81
2.5
Evan Zhang
0W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.80
Jason Nguyen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Luis Gallegos
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.