Teams

LA - Danielle Demianczyk

2026 Spring · Summer Flex Singles - LA

1 player · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-21vs LA - Michelle TesoroLost 01
L#1 SinglesDanielle Demianczyk vs Michelle Tesoro3-6, 5-7
2026-08-06vs LA - Joy ChoLost 01
L#1 SinglesDanielle Demianczyk vs Joy Cho3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · Summer Flex Singles - LA
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA - Joy Cho7272658
2LA - Jasmin Miller44441073
3LA - Andrea Dunlop3434970
4LA - Katie Lagen2020011
5LA - Michelle Tesoro2323650
6LA - Harriet Fraser1212428
7LA - Alisha Bauer Shuford1313645
8LA - Danielle Demianczyk0202424

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Danielle Demianczyk
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Demianczyk
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.