Teams

Young/Chattanooga

2024 Mixed Adult 18 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-21vs Watson/ChattanoogaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Gura / Sarah Delay vs Joseph Richard / Serena Lau5-7, 0-6
2024-07-15vs Watson/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Gura / Amy Weathers vs Brent Hemstreet / Rachel Birnbaum1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Hullender / Sarah Haney vs Joseph Richard / Carol Tigar1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWesley Alexander / Charmaine Kincaid vs Justin Jolly / Brittany Portwood3-6, 0-6
2024-07-06vs Watson/ChattanoogaWon 10
W#3 DoublesWayne Albergotti / Lynne Barkeloo vs Troy Carroll / Rachel Birnbaum7-5, 6-4
2024-06-22vs Watson/ChattanoogaLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharmaine Kincaid / Wesley Alexander vs Andrea Watson / Craig Lyons3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Haney / Andrew Gura vs Ashley Venkatesu / Ashwin Venkatesu2-6, 4-6
2024-06-17vs Watson/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesWayne Albergotti / Lynne Barkeloo vs Brent Hemstreet / Andrea Watson2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWesley Alexander / Amy Weathers vs Jordan Wells / Meghan Wells4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Hullender / Sarah Delay vs Justin Jolly / Brittany Portwood2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Sarah Haney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Sarah Delay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Amy Weathers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Lynne Barkeloo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Wayne Albergotti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Anthea Young
published 3.5
3.19
Charmaine Kincaid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Andrew Gura
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Wesley Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Michael Hullender
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynne Barkeloo + Wayne Albergotti213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Haney
38W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.59
Sarah Delay
64W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Amy Weathers
60W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Lynne Barkeloo
88W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
Wayne Albergotti
16W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Anthea Young
10W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Charmaine Kincaid
7W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Andrew Gura
2W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.97
Wesley Alexander
5W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.95
Michael Hullender
17W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%10%90%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.