Teams

Hebert/18/3.5/WD/BOC

2025 BR Adult 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 BR (18&O) Women Day

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-30vs Howard/18/3.5/WD/BRECWon 41
W#1 DoublesLiz McCarthy / Claesi Mccrary vs Dana Baggett / Dee Bullock6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAly Thames vs Ginger Ku4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLindsay Jeansonne / Shelly Fontenot vs Kitzia Bordlee / Sharon Wilkins7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStacy Hebert / Angela Montalbano vs Kerri Howard / Cindy Keith6-3, 6-2
W#4 DoublesAdrienne Taylor / Heather Bush vs Amy Sylvester / Kelly Magnon7-6, 7-6
2025-02-27vs SELLERS/18/3.5/WD/CCLWon 31
W#1 DoublesLiz McCarthy / Claesi Mccrary vs Cherie Favaro / Katie South2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHeather Jayson vs TIne Neames6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLindsay Jeansonne / Anna Kronenberger vs Alletia Sellers / Ellen Pino6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Brignac Talbot / Heather Bush vs Jenny Rome / Christy Mendoza3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 BR (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Claesi Mccrary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Heather Jayson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Liz McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Heidi Smith
published
3.35
Sharon Dileo
published
3.30
Stacy Hebert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Anna Kronenberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
MaryClaire Hotard
published
3.24
Kelli Guillot
published
3.23
Patricia Brignac Talbot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Shelly Fontenot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Lindsay Jeansonne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Angela Montalbano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Heather Bush
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Lesley Halphen
published
3.06
Aly Thames
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Adrienne Taylor
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Tracie Aguillard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz McCarthy + Claesi Mccrary8257% games+4.2% vs expected
Lindsay Jeansonne + Shelly Fontenot3345% games−3.1% vs expected
Adrienne Taylor + Tracie Aguillard134 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Smith + Stacy Hebert314 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Hebert + Angela Montalbano213 matchesnot enough data
Anna Kronenberger + Angela Montalbano123 matchesnot enough data
Liz McCarthy + Heather Jayson213 matchesnot enough data
Claesi Mccrary + Aly Thames213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claesi Mccrary
29W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Heather Jayson
30W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.52
Liz McCarthy
44W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Heidi Smith
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Sharon Dileo
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Stacy Hebert
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Anna Kronenberger
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
MaryClaire Hotard
26W–29L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Kelli Guillot
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Patricia Brignac Talbot
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Shelly Fontenot
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Lindsay Jeansonne
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Angela Montalbano
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Heather Bush
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Lesley Halphen
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Aly Thames
18W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Adrienne Taylor
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Tracie Aguillard
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.