Teams

OSTC - May

2025 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 4.0+

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-16vs Diamondhead - HailesWon 30
W#1 SinglesAbby Chapman vs Christina Robinson6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJennifer Maisano vs Jennifer Hailes3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAndrea May vs Lucy Stevens5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-12-11vs BBTC - MendenhallLost 02
L#1 SinglesAbby Chapman vs Carly Nichols Coy0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall2-6, 0-6
2025-11-13vs Diamondhead - HailesLost 12
L#1 SinglesAndrea May vs Stephanie Dohner1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Lucy Stevens6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMolly Pittman vs Mary Kay Walk1-6, 4-6
2025-11-06vs BBTC - MendenhallLost 12
L#1 SinglesAbby Chapman vs Lynette Cooper3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Carly Nichols Coy3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMolly Pittman vs Tana Cooper1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-04vs BBTC - MendenhallLost 12
L#1 SinglesAbby Chapman vs Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAndrea May vs Tana Cooper6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesDelynsi Che vs Carly Nichols Coy1-6, 2-6
2025-10-30vs Diamondhead - HailesLost 03
L#1 SinglesAndrea May vs Stephanie Dohner0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Nicole Montagnet2-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesKatie Brandon vs Jennifer Hailes6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 4.0+
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC - Mendenhall5111715135
2Diamondhead - Hailes339919141
3OSTC - May1571126180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Andrea May
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.40
Kelsey Martin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.21
Jennifer Maisano
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.12
Stacie Zorn
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.11
Katie Brandon
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
2.99
Molly Pittman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.98
Delynsi Che
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Abby Chapman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Maisano + Andrea May6160% games+2.8% vs expected
Kelsey Martin + Delynsi Che123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea May
36W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Kelsey Martin
19W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Jennifer Maisano
41W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Stacie Zorn
17W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Katie Brandon
14W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Molly Pittman
13W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3.5
Delynsi Che
33W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Abby Chapman
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.