Teams

Koch

2022 Anne Arundel Combo · Anne Arundel Combo 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-17vs ThomassonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJD Zachry / Greg Koch vs Joshua Fretz / Eugene Spencer3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJustin Wagner / David Mason vs Brian Kuhn / Frank von Hendricks4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-09-15vs ThomassonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKey Sar / Michael Bernhard vs Christopher Gowen / Andrew Isch7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJD Zachry / Greg Koch vs Joshua Fretz / Todd Trapnell7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-28vs ThomassonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJD Zachry / Joshua Sadler vs Adam Thomasson / Frank von Hendricks6-3, 6-2
2022-08-19vs ThomassonLost 01
L#3 DoublesMatthew Casbarro / David Mason vs Andrew Isch / Frank von Hendricks4-6, 5-7
2022-08-14vs ThomassonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoshua Sadler / Key Sar vs Andrew Isch / Jack Lavinder2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-08-06vs ThomassonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Casbarro / David Mason vs Andrew Isch / Frank von Hendricks7-5, 6-0
2022-07-30vs ThomassonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJD Zachry / Joshua Sadler vs Christopher Gowen / Frank von Hendricks7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
JD Zachry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Justin Wagner
published
3.71
Key Sar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Brian Kovalski
published 4
3.58
Scott A Green
published
3.50
Joshua Sadler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Ken Mitchell
published
3.44
Kushal Patel
published
3.38
Greg Koch
published 3.5
3.26
Michael Bernhard
published
3.15
David Mason
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Wagner + JD Zachry303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
JD Zachry
84W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Justin Wagner
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Key Sar
86W–97L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Brian Kovalski
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Scott A Green
39W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Joshua Sadler
126W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
Ken Mitchell
15W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
Kushal Patel
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Greg Koch
18W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Michael Bernhard
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
David Mason
30W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.