Teams

Points and Pints- Shelby Park

Points and Pints - Nashville · Points and Pints- Session I- Shelby Park - Spring

4 players · average NTRP 5.00 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Points and Pints- Session I- Shelby Park - Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Points and Pints- Shelby Park000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Bolds
published 5
4.21
Marissa Kovach
published
4.14
Tyler Strong
published
3.70
Robin Gilliam
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrew Bolds
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marissa Kovach
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
Tyler Strong
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
4.14
Robin Gilliam
25W–21L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.