Teams

Neal/Memphis

2026 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 4.0 Mixed 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-27vs Richards/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesAldell Gamble / Jennifer Magee vs Jonathan Laman / Latasha Echols1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSophia Manshack / Neal Patel vs Chi Zhang / Grace Bann7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrandon Brackett / Madelaine Cable vs Nelli Golmeeva / Irwin Corpuz6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-26vs Pelt/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrandon Brackett / Jennifer Carstensen vs Betsy Ferguson / Cory Heinkel6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Carney / Tread Thompson vs Hayley Hudson / Will Hudson3-6, 3-6
2026-07-25vs Brown/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesPeyton Neal / Madelaine Cable vs Ava Magness / Jon Bell6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNeal Patel / Savannah Nagle vs Cameron Seay / Daniel Forbes3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrandon Brackett / Taylor Bender vs Emily Brown / Freddy Ojeda4-6, 6-7
2026-07-12vs Alexander/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesNeal Patel / Heidi Wharton vs John Gleysteen / Bradi Bair6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPeyton Neal / Madelaine Cable vs Kristen Alexander / Keith Rice6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrandon Brackett / Taylor Bender vs Clayton Eber / Emily Koelsch6-2, 6-2
2026-06-28vs LeBlanc/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesNeal Patel / Savannah Nagle vs Caden LeBlanc / Alison van Brocklin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrandon Brackett / Sophia Manshack vs Emily Shows / Grant Goforth4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPeyton Neal / Taylor Bender vs Daniel Murdoch / Teri Clark6-3, 6-3
2026-06-10vs Pelt/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobert Langley / Alexandra Steinhausler vs Kevin Dacus / Katrina Grubb7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSavannah Nagle / Tread Thompson vs Cory Heinkel / Autumn Rich6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrandon Brackett / Madelaine Cable vs Katie Moore / Matt Moore6-2, 6-2
2026-06-07vs Richards/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesPeyton Neal / Alexandra Steinhausler vs Jonathan Laman / Andrea Henry4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNeal Patel / Savannah Nagle vs Latasha Echols / BALAJI KRISHNAIAH6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAldell Gamble / Kelly Carney vs Nelli Golmeeva / Chi Zhang3-6, 5-7
2026-06-02vs Moore/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesPeyton Neal / Jennifer Magee vs Micheal Moore / Dee Bias7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Carstensen / Aldell Gamble vs Mario Grant / Melissa Rodriguez Perez1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSophia Manshack / Neal Patel vs Kevin Turner / Gloria Hicks6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brown/Memphis7118615180
2LeBlanc/Memphis6216822202
3Neal/Memphis53121228219
4Pelt/Memphis35111328229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Aldell Gamble
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Peyton Neal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.77
Savannah Nagle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Brandon Brackett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.56
Robert Langley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Taylor Bender
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Kelly Carney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Heidi Wharton
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Tread Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Jennifer Carstensen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Madelaine Cable
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.23
Alexandra Steinhausler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Sophia Manshack
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandon Brackett + Madelaine Cable404 matchesnot enough data
Peyton Neal + Madelaine Cable213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aldell Gamble
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
Peyton Neal
27W–4L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.79
Savannah Nagle
13W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
3.5
Brandon Brackett
43W–4L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
Robert Langley
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
Taylor Bender
27W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
Kelly Carney
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43
Heidi Wharton
29W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Tread Thompson
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Jennifer Carstensen
30W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Madelaine Cable
27W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Alexandra Steinhausler
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Sophia Manshack
22W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.