Teams

EM RED

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-28vs CP REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesAshley Wolfe / Kathryn Terry vs Annie Rapson / Ashley Banister-Riley4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKari Hale vs Carolyn Welter3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Davy / Tammy Terhaar vs Stephanie Sims / Maureen Connor4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLibby Hanna / Erica Roybal vs Katie Kennedy / Traci Lynch7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-21vs SKY BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesColley Moe / Michele Olree vs Jennifer Lester / Katelin Ramer2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTammy Terhaar vs Kerry Hutcheson2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKaty Kappler / Stephanie Davy vs Lyndsey McLaughlan / Andrea Sykora6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKari Hale vs Sandra Schumm7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-07vs DCC GREENLost 23
W#1 DoublesMichele Olree / Colley Moe vs Julie Groves / Sara McDonnell7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKaty Kappler vs Lucy Dikeou7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathryn Terry / Ashley Wolfe vs Megan Harry / Kate Lively2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKari Hale vs Brooke Simpson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErica Roybal / Libby Hanna vs Elizabeth Walker / Jennifer Connelly6-3, 6-2
2026-04-30vs CACM REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesColley Moe / Michele Olree vs Libby Brien / Nancy Harlow-Irwin6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTammy Terhaar vs AUSRA MOLLERUD3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaty Kappler / Brilynn Cahill vs Neda Rasouli / Kimberly Schnetzer4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKari Hale vs Angie Demetulias6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKathryn Terry / Libby Hanna vs Kelly Kurtz / Jordan Arnell5-7, 4-6
2026-04-23vs GAC GREENWon 41
L#1 DoublesKaty Kappler / Michele Olree vs Spring Merino / Maureen Roskoski6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTammy Terhaar vs Carolyn Jeffrey6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephanie Davy / Ashley Wolfe vs Ann Baer / Mary Candee4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesColley Moe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLibby Hanna / Erica Roybal vs Wendy Liu / Anna Stansbury1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-04-16vs CHCC BLUELost 23
L#1 DoublesMichele Olree / Colley Moe vs Ann Marie Johnson / Vanessa Ramich3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTammy Terhaar vs Niki Goldberg6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Davy / Brilynn Cahill vs Callie Nowicki / Kelly Koch3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKari Hale vs Kim Addlesperger6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesErica Roybal / Ashley Wolfe vs Cindy Wells / Julianna Dixon6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Colley Moe
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Tammy Terhaar
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Katy Kappler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Libby Hanna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Ashley Wolfe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Kari Hale
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Michele Olree
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Brilynn Cahill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Stephanie Davy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Kathryn Terry
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Erica Roybal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Roybal + Libby Hanna8163% games+11.5% vs expected
Stephanie Davy + Brilynn Cahill9653% games+3.3% vs expected
Stephanie Davy + Erica Roybal6066% games+3.3% vs expected
Colley Moe + Michele Olree121253% games+1.5% vs expected
Stephanie Davy + Katy Kappler5354% games+1.4% vs expected
Kathryn Terry + Brilynn Cahill5750% games+0.3% vs expected
Colley Moe + Ashley Wolfe10949% games−0.4% vs expected
Michele Olree + Brilynn Cahill3454% games−1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Colley Moe
63W–75L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Tammy Terhaar
62W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Katy Kappler
137W–94L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
Libby Hanna
35W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Ashley Wolfe
49W–55L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Kari Hale
93W–63L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Michele Olree
89W–143L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Brilynn Cahill
56W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Stephanie Davy
66W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kathryn Terry
46W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Erica Roybal
76W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.